By Arlen Williams | Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 at 11:34 am …and the Chicago way
For the sensory pleasure of those who enjoyed the video short, “No Border Security without Amnesty – Obama to Sen. Jon Kyl” — we now present you this! — thanks to Naked Emperor News:
What is grossly corrupt for a Senator in 2004 is impeachable, for the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of our Republic.
And what of this cession of huge tracts of Arizona land, to Mexican criminals?
And of course, this civil action against Arizona, for their enforcement our Citizenship protection law which you so determinedly fail to enforce, Mr. PINO (president in name only)?
And what of these rumors of an executive order to grant amnesty to the entire set of criminal residents, so they can vote for your corrupt cronies?
By Arlen Williams | Sunday, June 20th, 2010 at 5:09 pm For the latest on the motives of Barack Obama and his “transnational progressive” allies, such as George Soros and Maurice Strong, regarding Mexico and the plans for North America under global governance, read the words and heed this video.
From Human Events — Sen. Kyl: ‘Obama Says No Border Security without Amnesty’:
by Connie Hair, Human Events, 6/20/2010
In a stunning revelation at an Arizona town hall meeting this past Friday, Republican Senator Jon Kyl told his constituents that President Obama privately insisted that he will not secure the border until amnesty for illegal aliens passes first. According to Kyl, Obama argued that Democrats would lose their bargaining chips for any type of amnesty if the government beefs up its presence on the chaotic border. “The problem is,” Obama allegedly told Kyl, “If we secure the border, then you all won’t have any reason to support comprehensive immigration reform.”
Since this is a brief post by Connie Hair, I decided to include all of it. Please visit the source. We are monitoring Ms. Hair’s reports from Congress and suggests them (link).
Transcript (at 3:21):
SEN. JON KYL: I met with the president in the Oval Office, just the two of us…. Here’s what the president said. “The problem is,” he said, “If we secure the border, then you all won’t have any reason to support comprehensive immigration reform.”
[gasps from the audience]
KYL: In other words they’re holding it hostage. They don’t want to secure the border unless and until it is combined with comprehensive immigration reform. Now, I explained, “You and I, Mr. President, have an obligation to secure the border. That’s an obligation. It also has some potentially positive benefits. You don’t have to have comprehensive reform to secure the border, but you have to secure the border to get comprehensive reform. I said, “You’d be surprised, maybe you don’t think that there would be any more incentive for comprehensive reform, but I’m not so sure that that’s true. In any event, it doesn’t matter. We’re supposed to secure the border.”
That’s why this is being done. They frankly don’t want to do it. They want to get something in return for doing their duty. And that’s—
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Chicago politics.
KYL: Yeah.
From Scott McKay at The Hayride:
According to Kyl, President Obama won’t secure the border in the Tucson Sector in Arizona because by doing so he loses leverage on “comprehensive immigration reform” – which is publicsectorese for making Democrat voters out of illegal aliens.
This is a man for whom playing politics trumps doing his job.
Which is not a surprise. We’ve known that all along.
But it’s still amazing that someone like this could possibly be president of the United States, no?
I’ll end this post with this question:
Is such gross refusal to abide by our Constitution and enforce U.S. law an impeachable level of misdemeanor?
By Arlen Williams | Monday, June 14th, 2010 at 6:42 pm “Do you fully support the Obama agenda?” This video shows just one hard question. If you have not already seen it, you may want to watch this video first, without any explanation. It shows a Democratic congressman assaulting a student in Washington, D.C. last week.
You may wish to read a bit about it at Big Government and Freedom’s Lighthouse for some background.
Frankly, we do not know the full story here, even after Democratic Rep. Bob Etheridge’s (NC-2nd) press conference apology. Had he been harassed by unidentified people with cameras prior to this? His behavior is not to be excused, but people who confront others with microphones and cameras should have the decency and sophistication of introducing themselves. Or, is he simply on his ear (and into another’s) because he is being put on the spot about the Obama agenda?
Does Etheridge realize the Obama agenda is stealing and destroying the wealth of America’s citizens who happen to have a bit of it (the bourgeoisie)? Worse yet, of eliminating our American sovereignties, and of bringing Marxist revolution and its slave-class system to our nation, along with fealty to global government, through planned “transnational progressive” initiatives such as Cap and Trade and the Climate Change Treaty?
In other words, “the Obama Agenda” is treason against America and we are in the thick of this warfare. Do you know that?
And speaking of “the full story here,” why do the “conservative” Representatives of Congress not talk (publicly) about the Obama agenda in these terms, which those who honestly study neo-Marxists know so well by now? I suggest confronting Republicans in Congress, asking them, complete with video camera and microphone: “Why are you not telling American citizens what the Obama agenda really is?”
Then ask them the three SOVEREIGNTY NOW questions and ask their challengers:
1. Are you a member of any organization supporting the ends of globalism, transnationalism, communitarianism, or U.N. Agenda 21 defined “sustainable development,” or have you received money, or services, or other favors from any of these?
2. Do you pledge to uphold America’s individual popular sovereignty, our parental sovereignty, the sovereignty of the states, and our national sovereignty, against every internal and external threat, according to our Constitution and our Declaration of Independence?
3. Do you pledge to support and not undermine the sovereignty of other free and benign nations, for example, an unified Israel, in its present borders, with its capital Jerusalem?
Then, let us ask for a full investigation of the unprecedented, monstrous scam of Cap and Trade, Climate Exchanges, and the Climate Treaty — a RICO investigation.
We get only the government we ask for, at best. Are you seeking? What are you finding?
By Arlen Williams | Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010 at 2:01 pm Investigative reporter James O’Keefe has released video demonstrating massive payroll fraud in the U.S. Census. And if the Census workers are being trained to falsify their payroll reports, how is our actual Census data being handled?
From BIGGOVERNMENT today:
On April 27, 2010, I got a job with the United States Census Bureau in New Jersey. With a hidden camera, I caught four Census supervisors encouraging enumerators to falsify information on their time sheets. Over the course of two days of training, I was paid for four hours of work I never did. I was told to take a 70 minute lunch break, was given an hour of travel time to drive 10 minutes, and was told to leave work at 3:30pm. I resigned prior to doing any data collection but confronted Census supervisors who assured me, “no one is going to be auditing that that level,” and “nobody is going to be questioning it except for you.” Another Census supervisor only said he’d adjust my pay after I gave him a letter recanting my hours.
“I don’t think anyone’s going to be questioning it, except for you.”
O’Keefe does the math: this could mean rampant fraud with workers trained to embezzle as much as $1,000,000,000 of taxpayers’ money, throughout the nation. The video is shown and James O’Keefe’s article continues at BIGGOVERNMENT.
Another undercover video report released today, reveals similarly systematic, trained, and approved embezzlement, in Louisiana. Again, this appears to be the order of the day and done on a massive scale:
Videos are found at the veritasvisuals page on YouTube..
The White House is officially running this operation. It took management of the U.S. Census away from the U.S. Department of Commerce, where it is traditionally administered. This is the same White House which is historically allied with ACORN and other Marxist/fascist operations and their operators, worldwide. Further, they are failing to enforce laws against massive illegal immigration, while persecuting Arizona for attempting to enforce official United States policy.
This purposeful and systematic abuse of government is clearly in line with the Cloward-Piven (or Alinsky, or Marxist, or… communist) strategy of corrupting, overwhelming, and collapsing American government, economy, and society. All, to bring about the revolution. This has been revealed by numerous Internet venues, including this one.
Tail wag: Brittany Pounders at Liberty Juice
By Arlen Williams | Friday, December 18th, 2009 at 9:44 pm Lord Christopher Monckton was knocked out cold by police at the climate change conference in Copenhagen Thursday. Lord Monckton is perhaps the world’s most senior and respected critic of the concept of man-made causality for global warming. He was “man-handled” by the authorities to the point of receiving a concussion.
Monckton is the former science advisor to Margaret Thatcher, who is taking the lead in exposing this global ploy, a scheme of the kind that might have come from the minds of Ian Fleming and Cubby Broccoli. His DVD, “Apocalypse? No!” conveys his presentation at Cambridge University on the subject. This has been covered previously by the Investigating Obama blog here and here thanks in part to the diligent citizen journalism of Walter Hudson.
The following article is Lord Christopher Monckton’s own, republished from yesterday’s post on The SPPI Blog, which he co-authors. Barack Obama is, by his pitched efforts, a co-conspirator in the Man-Made Global Marxofascism shakedown, along with Maurice Strong, Edmund de Rothschild, George Soros, Al Gore, Jeffrey Immelt – General Electric’s robber baron, etc.
Marxofascism? Yes, it is an archetypal combination of Marxist redistribution of wealth, plus profiteering by kleptocratic finance, or, “gaming the system,” as the man behind the curtain of America’s Democratic Party, mega-criminal financier György Schwartz (a.k.a., Soros, by his literally “making a name for himself”) tends to say. Monckton’s account follows:
|
Is the European police state going global?
From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Copenhagen
Today the gloves came off and the true purpose of the “global warming” scare became nakedly visible. Ugo Chavez, the Socialist president of Venezuela, blamed “global warming” on capitalism – and received a standing ovation from very nearly all of the delegates, lamentably including those from those of the capitalist nations of the West that are on the far Left – and that means too many of them.
Previously Robert Mugabe, dictator of Rhodesia, who had refused to leave office when he had been soundly defeated in a recent election, had also won plaudits at the conference for saying that the West ought to pay him plenty of money in reparation of our supposed “climate debt”.
Inside the conference center, “world leader” after “world leader” got up and postured about the need to Save The Planet, the imperative to do a deal, the necessity to save the small island nations from drowning, etc., etc., etc.
Outside, in the real world, it was snowing, and a foretaste of the Brave New World being cooked up by “world leaders” in their fantasy-land was already evident. Some 20,000 observers from non-governmental organizations – nearly all of them true-believing Green groups funded by taxpayers – had been accredited to the conference.
However, without warning the UN had capriciously decided that all but 300 of them were to be excluded from the conference today, and all but 90 would be excluded on the final day.
Of course, this being the inept UN, no one had bothered to notify those of the NGOs that were not true-believers in the UN’s camp. So Senator Steve Fielding of Australia and I turned up with a few dozen other delegates, to be left standing in the cold for a couple of hours while the UN laboriously worked out what to do with us.
In the end, they decided to turn us away, which they did with an ill grace and in a bad-tempered manner. As soon as the decision was final, the Danish police moved in. One of them began the now familiar technique of manhandling me, in the same fashion as one of his colleagues had done the previous day.
Once again, conscious that a police helicopter with a high-resolution camera was hovering overhead, I thrust my hands into my pockets in accordance with the St. John Ambulance crowd-control training, looked my assailant in the eye and told him, quietly but firmly, to take his hands off me.
He complied, but then decided to have another go. I told him a second time, and he let go a second time. I turned to go and, after I had turned my back, he gave me a mighty shove that flung me to the ground and knocked me out.
I came to some time later (not sure exactly how long), to find my head being cradled by my friends, some of whom were doing their best to keep the police thugs at bay while the volunteer ambulance-men attended to me.
I was picked up and dusted me off. I could not remember where I had left my telephone, which had been in my hand at the time when I was assaulted. I rather fuzzily asked where it was, and one of the police goons shouted, “He alleges he had a mobile phone.”
In fact, the phone was in my coat pocket, where my hand had been at the time of the assault. The ambulance crew led me away and laid me down under a blanket for 20 minutes to get warm, plying me with water and keeping me amused with some colorfully colloquial English that they had learned.
I thanked them for their kindness, left them a donation for their splendid service, and rejoined my friends. A very senior police officer then came up and asked if I was all right. Yes, I said, but no thanks to one of his officers, who had pushed me hard from behind when my back was turned and had sent me flying.
The police chief said that none of his officers would have done such a thing. I said that several witnesses had seen the incident, which I intended to report. I said I had hoped to receive an apology but had not received one, and would include that in my report. The policeman went off looking glum, and with good reason.
To assault an accredited representative of a conference your nation is hosting, and to do it while your own police cameramen are filming from above, and to do it without any provocation except my polite, non-threatening request that I should not be manhandled, is not a career-enhancing move, as that police chief is about to discover to his cost.
Nor does this incident, and far too many like it, reflect the slightest credit on Denmark. We must make reasonable allowance for the fact that the unspeakable security service of the UN, which is universally detested by those at this conference, was ordering the Danish police about. The tension between the alien force and the indigenous men on the ground had grown throughout the conference.
However, the Danish police were far too free with their hands when pushing us around, and that is not acceptable in a free society. But then, Europe is no longer a free society. It is, in effect, a tyranny ruled by the unelected Kommissars of the European Union. That is perhaps one reason why police forces throughout Europe, including that in the UK, have become far more brutal than was once acceptable in their treatment of the citizens they are sworn to serve.
It is exactly this species of tyranny that the UN would like to impose upon the entire planet, in the name of saving us from ourselves – or, as Ugo Chavez would put it, saving us from Western capitalist democracy.
A few weeks ago, at a major conference in New York, I spoke about this tendency towards tyranny with Dr. Vaclav Klaus, the distinguished economist and doughty fighter for freedom and democracy who is President of the Czech Republic.
While we still have one or two statesmen of his caliber, there is hope for Europe and the world. Unfortunately, he refused to come to Copenhagen, telling me that there was no point, now that the lunatics were firmly in control of the asylum.
However, I asked him whether the draft Copenhagen Treaty’s proposal for what amounted to a communistic world government reminded him of the Communism under which he and his country had suffered for so long.
He thought for a moment – as statesmen always do before answering an unusual question – and said, “Maybe it is not brutal. But in all other respects, what it proposes is far too close to Communism for comfort.”
Today, as I lay in the snow with a cut knee, a bruised back, a banged head, a ruined suit, and a written-off coat, I wondered whether the brutality of the New World Order was moving closer than President Klaus – or any of us – had realized.
|
Brutality is as stupid does.
By Arlen Williams | Saturday, November 21st, 2009 at 1:12 am Thoughtful analysis tells us that the only logical reason for passing the current health care bill is to destroy the United States. Every one of us who understands what is happening needs to spell it out to our U.S. Senators and to every other citizen we can reach.
Trying to determine what I could possibly say to my U.S. Senators’ office staffs about the medical takeover bill that could make any difference, I settled upon telling them this:
The only logical reason to enact this Obama-Pelosi-Reid legislation, is to continue to destroy authentic America, in favor of an authoritarian, Marxofascist revolution.
And it is a violent revolution, whether it brings gunfire or not, since it deeply violates those most fundamental rights, to life, liberty, and property, which define the United States of America.
Are you going to vote for it and in doing so, declare this violent revolution as your aim?
Surely, the crafters of this monstrously complex legislation are not unintelligent, nor are its political strategists guileless. So, what other intention is left, but the chief result it would have? That message and questioning are what must be drummed into the media, too — and by word of mouth, email, blogging, social networking, comments, etc., drummed thoroughly into America’s consciousnesses and consciences.
After all, destroying our country is what this legislation would do. It would tragically harm, not help, Americans medically. It would overwhelmingly harm, not help, American society as it strategically slips into the intentionally destructive agenda for “fundamentally changing America.” This nefarious plan is presented not only by Barack Obama, but also by his globalist point-man, George Soros, also by Nancy Pelosi, by their contemporary “Democratic Party” apparatchiks — and going back, by Cloward-Piven, Saul Alinsky, the Frankfurt School, the KGB, etc.
For supporting details showing how one arrives at this conclusion, peruse the series of articles tagged “health control” at Investigating Obama, or go directly to Dr. David Janda’s open letter, The Obama Health Care Plan – in One Word.
As Sarah Palin told Sean Hannity in their recent interview, Americans deserve to be told the truth about those who seek (and have now gained) power. Anything less is irresponsible. So, how can our consciences allow us to keep from telling free Americans the truth, about what so glaringly threatens to become the end of our history?
By Arlen Williams | Sunday, September 20th, 2009 at 12:22 am As soon as I had read to the end of the first excerpt, I knew I had to share this essay on Marxist training. The parallel between the cat’s hot pepper and the socialism of the bailout is stunning. From COMMUNISM and the Evolution of the “Errors of Russia” by Solange Hertz:
How do you get a cat to eat hot pepper? This question, a classic in Marxist training manuals, opens an exercise in revolutionary technique. The answer, to which the student is led by logic and common experience, explains how Communism has been able to take over a third of the world without serious opposition.
How does one get a cat to eat pepper, a condiment as unpalatable to him as Marxist doctrine is to healthy human nature? The first answer to present itself says the primer, is obvious: Force open the cat’s jaws and cram the pepper in.
Wrong, the student is told, because the cat’s willing cooperation is lacking. The second answer – to conceal the pepper in a tasty fish – is equally inadequate, because as soon as the cat detects the pepper he simply regurgitates it.
The correct answer: Sprinkle the pepper all over the cat’s mat. When he lies on it the pepper will cling to his fur and sting, so that he will soon be licking himself to get it off. This method assures perfect assimilation because (1) the cat is actually ingesting (2) entirely on his own initiative, (3) and a completely conditioned initiative at that, (4) pepper, which he hates.
Pius XI in effect described this cat-and-pepper ploy in his encyclical Divini Redemptorist, promulgated on the feast of St. Joseph, 1937: “The Communist takes advantage of the present world-wide economic crisis,” which he foments “to draw into the sphere of his influence even those sections of the populace which on principle reject all forms of materialism and terrorism… The preachers of Communism are also proficient in exploiting racial antagonism and political divisions…”
It wields “a propaganda so truly diabolical that the world has perhaps never witnessed its like before. It is directed from one common center. It is shrewdly adapted to the varying conditions of diverse peoples. It has at its disposal vast financial resources, gigantic organizations, international congresses and countless trained workers. It makes use of pamphlets and reviews of cinema, theatre and radio, of schools and universities” – a list to which must now be added television and our very churches. “Little by little it penetrates into all classes of the people and even reaches the better-minded groups of the community with the result that few are aware of the poison which increasingly pervades their minds and hearts.”….
Are you intrigued now? Go read all of this essay.
|
Border Security for Amnesty, the Prequel
